A Lightweight Framework for Evaluating LLM Assistants in Production
A practical, low-cost evaluation loop that small product teams can run on every release of an AI feature.
Read more Back to Research
Report
The State of Automation in Small and Mid-Sized Teams
Where growing teams lose time, which workflows they automate first, and what separates projects that stick from those that stall.
Abstract
We analysed the automation projects we delivered and scoped with small and mid-sized teams to understand which processes are automated first, how long they take to pay back, and why some projects fail to reach adoption.
Key findings
- Lead routing, reporting and onboarding are the most common first automations.
- Projects with a named internal owner reach adoption far more often.
- Most payback comes from removing hand-offs between tools, not from AI alone.
Methodology
This report summarises patterns from automation projects delivered and scoped by Orbiht. It is a practitioner's view, not a statistical survey, and should be read as such.
Where time goes
Across teams, the biggest time sinks were not complex tasks — they were hand-offs: copying data between tools, chasing approvals and assembling reports.
What gets automated first
- Lead intake and routing
- Recurring reports and dashboards
- Customer and employee onboarding
- Document and invoice processing
Why projects stall
The most common reason was not technical. It was the absence of an internal owner who kept the workflow updated as the business changed.
Recommendations
- Start with one high-frequency workflow and measure the time saved.
- Assign an internal owner from day one.
- Treat automations as products: version them, monitor them and improve them.
Comments 0
Demo mode — comments are saved in this browser only. Add your Firebase keys to .env to enable real Google sign-in.
Loading comments…